题目：
The following appeared in an editorial in a local newspaper.
"Commuters complain that increased rush-hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time. The favored proposal of the motorists' lobby is to widen the highway， adding an additional lane of traffic. Opponents note that last year's addition of a lane to the nearby Green Highway was followed by a worsening of traffic jams on it. Their suggested alternative proposal is adding a bicycle lane to Blue Highway. Many area residents are keen bicyclists. A bicycle lane would encourage them to use bicycles to commute， it is argued， thereby reducing rush-hour traffic."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
中文翻译：
乘客抱怨在郊区与市中心的B高速公路的更长交通高峰期使他们在路上的时间多花了一倍。 一个驾驶协会的不错建议是拓宽高速公路，修建一条附加机动车道。但反对者却说去年临近的G高速采用了相同的方法后交通状况更加恶化。他们建议一种更好的建议是在B高速上修一条自行车道。很多的当地人都是自行车爱好者。一条新的自行车道将会激励他们骑自行车外出，这样的方式会减少高峰时间的交通流量。
写一篇回应，在其中讨论还有哪些问题需要被回答才能决定文中的推荐是否能得到预期结果，并务请解释对这些问题的回答是如何帮助更好的评估文中的建议的。
感谢您阅读《argument29 》一文，出国留学网(liuxue86.com)编辑部希望本文能帮助到您。